Categories
- Apostolic Fathers (21)
- Baptists (1)
- Books (46)
- Christology (3)
- Church Fathers (13)
- Digitization (5)
- Early Christianity (20)
- Eastern Orthodox (1)
- Ecclesiology (7)
- Education (22)
- General (81)
- Gnosticism (2)
- Gospels Studies (10)
- Greece (16)
- Greek (97)
- Greek Handwriting (22)
- History (8)
- Mark (1)
- New Testament (9)
- NT Apocrypha (10)
- Pauline Studies (2)
- Software (3)
- Technology (8)
- Textual Criticism (51)
- The Reformation (1)
Archives
- November 2007 (4)
- December 2007 (7)
- January 2008 (17)
- February 2008 (32)
- March 2008 (30)
- April 2008 (39)
- May 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (20)
- July 2008 (29)
- August 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (7)
- November 2008 (12)
- December 2008 (9)
- January 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (17)
- May 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (3)
- October 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (2)
- August 2010 (1)
Blogroll
Along with the nomina sacra, there are a number of other shorthand marks in Greek manuscripts. One very common one is the nu bar. Here it is in Sinaiticus:
The text reads as follows:
ιδινυμασινατιμε ταδωχαρισμαυμιν
Or broken apart, it reads ιδιν υμας ινα τι μεταδω χαρισμα υμιν. The ιδιν is an itacistic rendering of ιδειν. This text comes from Romans 1:11, which says "[For I long] to see you in order that I might impart some spiritual gift to you..."
The handwriting feature I want to point out is the horizontal bar suspended above the iota at the end of the second line. Without that bar the last word would read υμι instead of υμιν...which would be weird. That horizontal bar is the "nu bar" for a lack of a decent term. It is frequently used when the line ends in the letter nu. It is not necessarily when the word ends in nu, because nu bars will show up at the end of a line even if the word is split between two lines.
So there you have it. One more very common feature of the handwriting you will see in Greek manuscripts. Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.
Image courtesy of CSNTM